English Proofreading
For Lawyers, By Lawyers
Say NO to ‘functionally illegible’ legal writing!
In Duncan v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 668 F. Supp. 232 (1987), the defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted for several reasons, including poor organization. The court’s opinion stated: “A complaint may be so poorly composed as to be functionally illegible.”
If only the complainant had had access to the professional services of WeProofread.it …
What is “proofreading”?
23/05/2020
A misplaced comma can be expensive!
20/05/2020
Neglecting to review your writing: Risky behaviour
12/05/2020
The Importance of Punctuation
27/04/2020
COVID-19: Pro-Bono Proofreading of English texts
17/03/2020
Say NO to ‘functionally illegible’ legal writing!
14/12/2019
Court imposes fine for wrong grammar, punctuation
12/11/2019
Legal writing is no laughing matter
25/09/2019
Load more posts